The Scientific Fraud of Global Warming

The eminent physicist Hal Lewis resigns from The American Physical Society:

“It is the greatest and most successful pseudo-scientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.”

Perhaps the single dumbest argument presented in support of Global Warming is that “the scientific consensus is that it’s true” – that is of course a lie and as untrue as it is stupid. In an effort to control the debate and expell Heretics from the Church of Global Warmingism, we get Priestly statements like, “you’re not qualified” or “we only look at peer-reviewed scientists” – which another lie.

That’s breaking down.  Hal Lewis is one of the Senior Statesmen of American Physics.  He’s been a member of the American Physical Society for 67 years (!).  His bio lays out his bona fides:

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making).

Hal Lewis thinks that Global Warming is an anti-scientific, money-grabbing scam by scientists, and says so in a brutal resignation letter sent to the president of the APS:

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

This is a huge media story that our biased press is unlikely to print, so RTWT and pass this around to your friends and family.  Professor Lewis is pointed in calling out filthy lucre as the heart of the corruption, even accusing the APS president himself:

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.

And from Watts Up With That?

This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science.


About NotClauswitz

The semi-sprawling adventures of a culturally hegemonic former flat-lander and anti-idiotarian individualist, fleeing the toxic cultural smug emitted by self-satisfied lotus-eating low-land Tesla-driving floppy-hat wearing lizadroid-Leftbat Califorganic eco-tofuistas ~

2 thoughts on “The Scientific Fraud of Global Warming

  1. Ted – The outright ideological “Catholicism” of the Green-Left movement is no different than the Church that Martin Luther condemned – and equally tied to monetary gain for that “church”.
    Sam – That what you noted shows just how far the money-driven pseudo-scientific “consensus” has poked its nasty tentacles into aspects of normal life – and how Government and its by-associations seriously distort the market, even of ideas and of Science, well beyond Governments distortion of capital markets; with subsidies, regulations, and tariffs. They have created a tariff on knowledge and scientific understanding, from which they find a means to benefit themselves.

  2. The Society of American Foresters and the American Forest Foundation both have stayed on the Global Warming Bandwagon in order to grab your tax dollars for “research,” in spite of the exposed fraud. SAF accredits forestry schools, and most of the profs in those schools evidently are in lockstep with the leaders so they can grab their share of $.

Comments are closed.